FOLLOW US ON TWITTER TO READ THE REACTION OF ELRUFAI AND UBA SANI
Former governor of Kaduna state Mallam Nasir Elrufai has lambasted his successor Uba Sani of fabricating wrong figures , just to malign him and bring him and his team in bad light. Remember, we told you how , Elrufai collected over 300 million dollar loan from the world bank and how he distributed the fund to major key policies of his administration. Take a look at the full details below.
The former governor, who spoke through his former commissioners at a press conference in Abuja, dismissed the purported financial report indicting them, saying that the so-called report lacked merit and was deliberately and mischievously orchestrated by Uba Sani and his team to discredit him and his administration.
“The avalanche of figures seems only to have had the effect of mesmerising the legislators who cite one amount here, and then something different on exactly the same figure,” the commissioners said at the press conference in Abuja on Tuesday.
![UBANI AND ELRUFAI/KADUNA DEBT.](https://www.niscompress.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/uba-sani-1024x576.jpg)
“The Report does not show how they arrived at this figure, and how they decided that money had been siphoned, how it was done, from which accounts and to where. They just decreed a figure and declared it! This is the Ad-hoc Committee in action, indulging in voodoo accounting just to concoct a scandal.
“State Government’s share of revenues is put at N811,663,310,000 on Page 138. Yet, by the time they got to Page 168, the Committee had adopted a different figure of N1,497,682,993.375, without saying how and why. These contradictory figures within the same Report illustrate the lack of consistency, credibility and reliability of the so-called findings.
![elrufai-and-uba-sani](https://www.niscompress.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/elrufai-and-uba-sani.webp)
“The Ad-hoc Committee alleges that a State Government “siphoned” more than half of the N811.6bn it got as revenues over eight years, but it cannot even decide on the precise amount of these total revenues,” the commissioners alleged.The former commissioners also accused the authors of report of having a conflict of interests and being unfit to preside over the sessions that purportedly indicted them, citing the Speaker and others are examples.